MCC# 99-116
GJCC#83-99
RESOLUTION NO. 83-99
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY OF MESA AND THE CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION CONCERNING ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2000 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, The City and County have been designated by the Governor as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Grand Junction/Mesa County Urbanized Area; and
WHEREAS, Part 2 of Article 1 of Title 29, Colorado Revised Statutes authorizes the parties to contract with one another to make the most efficient and effective use of
their powers and responsibilities; and
WHEREAS, The City and County realize the importance of both short and long range planning in the development of an efficient transportation system, and are both aware
that it is the responsibility of the Metropolitan Planning Organization to perform those planning functions; and
WHEREAS, The City and County, in their performance of those planning functions
for the Urbanized Area, wish to use Federal Highway Administration and Federal
Transit Administration transportation planning funds in coordination with the Colorado Department of Transportation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT JOINTLY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO:
That the Fiscal Year 2000 Unified Planning Work Program, hereunto attached, was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Mesa, Colorado on July 19, 1999, and by the City Council of the City of Grand Junction, Colorado on July 21, 1999.
CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION COUNTY OF MESA
/s/ Gene Kinsey /s/ Kathryn Hall
Mayor Chair of the Board
Grand Junction City Council Mesa County Board of Commissioners
21st day of July, 1999 19th day of July, 1999
Attest: Attest:
/s/ Stephanie Nye /s/ Monika Todd
City Clerk County Clerk
FY 2000
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
FOR THE
GRAND JUNCTION/MESA COUNTY URBANIZED AREA
Prepared by the
Mesa County
Regional Transportation Planning Office
Grand Junction/Mesa County
Metropolitan Planning Organization
& Transportation Planning Region
and the
Colorado Department of Transportation
Division of Transportation Development
Program Management Branch
In cooperation with the
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Transit Administration
June, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 3
Summary of the Budget 6
UPWP Work Tasks 8
Tables
Table 1-- Summary of the Budget 6
Table 2 -- Funding Breakdown 6
Table 3 -- UPWP Task Costs 7
Figures
Figure 1 -- Transportation Planning Terminology 2
Figure 2 -- Urbanized Area Map 4
Figure 3 -- MPO Local Review Process 5
Figure 4 -- Task Schedule 14
FIGURE 1-- TRANSPORTATION PLANNING TERMINOLOGY
Air Quality Control Commission AQCC
Annual Element AE
Colorado Department of Transportation CDOT
U.S. Department of Transportation DOT
Federal Highway Administration FHWA
Federal Transportation Administration FTA
Fiscal Year for the MPO FY
Intermodal Surface Transportation Act ISTEA
Metropolitan Planning Organization MPO
FHWA planning funds made available through CDOT to the MPO PL Funds
FTA funds made available through CDOT to the MPO Section 5303 Funds
State Implementation Plan SIP
State Planning and Research Funds SPR
Title VI of the U.S., Civil Right Act of 1964, as amended Title VI
Transit Development Plan TDP
Transportation Improvement Plan TIP
Transportation Policy Advisory Committee TPAC
Transportation Technical Advisory Committee TTAC
Unified Planning Work Program UPWP
Urban Transportation Planning Process UTPP
Vehicle Miles Traveled VMT
INTRODUCTION
The Unified Planning Work Program describes planning tasks and personnel costs and also budgets funds for the Fiscal Year 2000 running from October 1, 1999 through September 30, 2000. The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), composed of Grand Junction and Mesa County elected officials and staff, coordinates this planning with state officials from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Colorado Health Department who, through the Air Quality Control Commission, is charged with protecting air quality throughout Colorado. The ultimate goal of this planning process is an efficient, effective transportation system.
To further the continuing, comprehensive, and cooperative planning for the Grand Junction Urbanized Area (Fig. 2,) the Federal Highway Administration provides Planning (PL) funds to the MPO under the administration of CDOT. The FY 2000 PL allocation is $94,364. The MPO also plans to program $20,000 of Section 5303 funds from the Federal Transit Administration. Both funding sources have been consolidated in one Consolidated Planning Grant administered by CDOT. These funds are matched at an 18.0% ratio by the MPO members. Local match for PL and Section 5303 is $25,104 and is split 50/50 between Mesa County and the City of Grand Junction. In addition, the MPO will receive $18,000 with no cash match in Smart Growth grant funds in FY 2000 to complete transit planning tasks for the new Grand Valley Transit system. Section 5307 FTA grant funds will provide $4,000 with a $1,000 local match requirement for a total of $5,000 in FY 2000 for the purpose of FTA grant administration. The new Access to Jobs grant includes $6,250 in Federal funds with a $6,250 match requirement provided by the Department of Human Services (DHS) for a total of $12,500 in FY 2000, also for grant administration. Other funding for FY 2000 includes $14,000 from Mesa County, $2,500 from Fruita, and $1,000 from Palisade for a total of $17,500 for Transportation Planning Region planning activities and $5,000 from CDOT for the Transit Visibility Project. The MPO, therefore, proposes to spend a total of $197,468, including local match, on transportation-related tasks contained in the FY 2000 Unified Planning Work Program.
CDOT, as the Contract Administrator, monitors the timely accomplishment of tasks and the reimbursement process. In addition, CDOT actively participates in the planning process through the provision of technical services (Fig. 3.)
The current local operational structure allows for maximum funding to be channeled to local City and County agencies through the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) and Transportation Policy Advisory Committee (TPAC) and to provide staff and resources for completion of the various tasks. The MPO continues to shift much of the administrative activity associated with each task (grant administration, planning, and implementation) into the task budget itself. This allows the MPO Administrator to focus on required documents, annual certification, and overall policy development for the agency, and to direct more dollars to actual studies and activities.
The MPO is housed within the Mesa County Regional Transportation Planning Office and performs administrative functions working directly to support the task elements of the FY 2000 UPWP. This office is the "single point-of-contact" between MPO agencies and state and federal officials. The technical operational agencies assume an active role in developing, implementing, and monitoring the program tasks.
The MPO Administrator provides technical support and performs the managerial tasks necessary for the MPO to comply with state and federal requirements. Program goals call for continued support of grant administration, planning, and implementation tasks with minimum administrative overhead. The MPO's local approach to this UPWP should accomplish those goals.
FIGURE 2 -- URBANIZED AREA MAP
FIGURE 3 -- GRAND JUNCTION / MESA COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION LOCAL REVIEW PROCESS
DECISION MAKING OFFICIALS Grand Junction City Council Mesa County Commissioners
TRANSPORTATION POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TPAC) Grand Junction City Council Designee Mesa County Commissioners Designee State Transportation Commission Designee Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Designee Federal Highway Administration Designee
MPO ADMINISTRATION Mesa County Regional Transportation Planning Office
TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TTAC) Colorado Dept. Of Health~ Air Pollution Control Div., Denver Colorado Dept. Of Transportation, Region 3 Colorado Dept. Of Transportation~ Div. of Transportation Development, Denver Colorado State Patrol Federal Highway Administration, Denver Grand Junction Haz Mat Coordinator Grand Junction Community Development Grand Junction Public Works Mesa County Public Works Dept. Mesa County Planning & Development Dept - Division of Long Range Planning Mesa County Health Dept. Federal Transportation Administration~ Region VIII, Denver City of Fruita Town of Palisade Town of Colbran Town of DeBeque |
SUMMARY OF THE BUDGET
For FY 2000 it is proposed that $197,468 be expended by the MPO on transportation planning. Of that amount $32,354 is the required match from Grand Junction, Mesa County, and other local sources and $17,500 is to be provided by Mesa County, Fruita, and Palisade for Transportation Planning Region activities. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transportation Administration funds administered through CDOT, and Smart Growth funds provide $147,614 for regional transportation planning efforts. A breakdown of these funds by task group and agency is shown below.
TABLE 1-- SUMMARY OF THE BUDGET
Task | PL & Sec 5303 |
Sec 5307 | Smart Growth | Access to Jobs |
TVP |
TPR |
Total |
A.1 FY 2000 UPWP | $7,200 | $7,200 | |||||
A.2 Administration | 41,518 | $5,000 | $12,500 | $5,000 | $14,750 | 78,768 | |
A.3 Training and Travel | 8,500 | 8,500 | |||||
B.1 Planning Tasks | 45,000 | $18,000 | 2,000 | 65,000 | |||
B.2 Final/Imp. 2020 Update | 35,000 | 750 | 35,750 | ||||
C.1 2000-2005 TIP | 2,250 | 2,250 | |||||
TOTAL | $139,468 | $5,000 | $18,000 | $12,500 | $5,000 | $17,500 | $197,468 |
TABLE 2 -- FUNDING BREAKDOWN
Funding Sources |
Grants | Mesa County | Grand Junction |
DHS |
Fruita |
Palisade |
Total |
PL & Section 5303 | $114,364 | $12,552 | $12,552 | $139,468 | |||
Section 5307 | 4,000 | 1,000 | 5,000 | ||||
Smart Growth | 18,000 | 18,000 | |||||
Access to Jobs | 6,250 | $6,250 | 12,500 | ||||
Transit Visibility Project | 5,000 | 5,000 | |||||
TPR Contributions | 14,000 | $2,500 | $1,000 | 17,500 | |||
TOTAL | $147,614 | $27,552 | $12,552 | $6,250 | $2,500 | $1,000 | $197,468 |
TABLE 3 -- UPWP TASK COSTS
Task | Local Match |
PL |
Sec 5303 | Sec 5307 | Smart Growth | Access to Jobs |
TVP |
Total |
A.1 FY 2000 UPWP | $1,296 | $5,904 | $7,200 | |||||
A.2 Administration | 25,323 | 19,695 | $18,500 | $4,000 | $6,250 | $5,000 | 78,768 | |
A.3 Training and Travel | 1,530 | 5,470 | 1,500 | 8,500 | ||||
B.1 Planning Tasks | 13,180 | 33,820 | $18,000 | 65,000 | ||||
B.2 Final/Imp. 2020 Update | 8,075 | 27,675 | 35,750 | |||||
C.1 2000-2005 TIP | 450 | 1,800 | 2,250 | |||||
TOTAL | $49,854 | $94,364 | $20,000 | $4,000 | $18,000 | $6,250 | $5,000 | $197,468 |
GRAND JUNCTION / MESA COUNTY MPO
UPWP WORK TASKS
The major portion of this document consists of work tasks to be completed during Fiscal Year 2000 (October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000.) These work tasks are intended to monitor and implement the continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive urban transportation planning process carried out by the MPO and CDOT in the Grand Junction urbanized area. The agencies with primary responsibility for completion of each task are listed in the UPWP. The UPWP is intentionally presented as an outline of primary funding sources and planning schedules. An overview of the entire planning process is contained in the Memorandum of Agreement establishing the MPO. (See Figure 3 for the MPO structure.)
Figure 4 provides a summary of scheduling for all UPWP tasks. Work tasks of a continuing nature are differentiated from those with definable time frames. Modifications in task schedules are reflected in monitoring reports. Significant changes in schedules will be agreed to by CDOT and the MPO. An accomplishment report for FY 2000 will be completed in October, 2000 and submitted to CDOT.
A. MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
The primary objective of the UPWP management activities is to provide for the on-going management of the urban transportation planning program in the Grand Junction urbanized area. Secondary objectives include grants management, coordination of planning efforts between local, regional and state agencies, citizen participation and monitoring, and documentation of transportation planning efforts and technical studies through locally adopted planning documents. Since the MPO and CDOT share responsibility for compliance with Federal planning guidelines, both agencies are involved in program management activities.
A.1. Task Name: Fiscal Year 2001 (October 1, 2000 through September 30, 2001) Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
Objective: To perform the necessary management tasks to produce a FY 2001 UPWP that will include all transportation planning activities, regardless of Federal funding sources, which significantly impact the local Study Area, whether performed on a federal, state, or local level.
Product: A Unified Planning Work Program for FY 2001.
Schedule: A meeting to discuss work needs will be held in March. The UPWP first draft will be completed in April, with adoption by May 15th. The MPO Contract will be signed by the Grand Junction City Council, Mesa County Commissioners, and the State of Colorado by September 30th.
Agency: MPO Administrator
Personnel: Local - 20 days
Costs: $7,200 (Includes non-salary costs)
A.2. Task Name: Administration.
Objective: To effectively administer, manage, support, monitor, coordinate, and control the continuing federally-assisted transportation planning processes for the Grand Junction urbanized area through the following activities:
(1) Maintain the commitments included in the Memorandum of Agreement and the
(2) contracts for planning funds (PL funds and Section 5303 funds);
(2) Submit monitoring reports on the FY2000 UPWP tasks;
(3) Maintain and document expenditures and submit financial reports;
(4) Support members of the decision making bodies, Transportation Policy Advisory Committee, Transportation Technical Advisory Committee, and the City and County Planning Commissions in their decisions on MPO-related activities;
(5) To monitor significant policy activities on the federal, state, and local levels that could have potential impact on MPO activities. At the direction of the MPO, represent the MPO members in federal, state, and local decision-making processes;
(6) Represent the MPO in the Regional Transportation Planning Organization;
(7) Monitor UPWP task activities;
(8) Assist in development of RFP's for UPWP study and coordinate contracts.
(9) Develop and implement effective citizen participation activities.
Schedule: Continuous throughout the year with quarterly monitoring reports (October, January, April, and July) and TTAC meetings as required.
Agency: Regional Transportation Planning Office
Personnel: Local - 300 days
Costs: $78,768 (Includes non-salary costs)
A.3 Task Name: Training and Travel
Objective: To provide training for MPO member agency personnel and increase their expertise in transportation planning and related issues. Pay for travel associated with ongoing programs.
Products: The product of this effort will be the successful completion of training courses by selected staff members.
Schedule: Continuous throughout the year. Progress reports furnished quarterly.
Agency: Regional Transportation Planning Office
Personnel: Local - 50 days
Costs: $8,500 (Includes non-salary costs)
B. PLANNING ACTIVITIES
The primary objective of planning activities is to support the decision-making process of the MPO through the development of studies and analyzes concerning short and long-term transportation needs.
B.1. Task Name: Planning Tasks
Objective: To create a “Total Transportation Solution” for the urbanized area through a multi-modal, travel demand management approach to studies, analyses, and recommendations. This includes extensive use of traffic/transit modeling, geographic information systems for transportation (GIS-T), technical assistance to requesting agencies and to the public, and training programs for the area’s planning commissions in transportation planning, implementation tools & impact analysis. Specific tasks include: implementation of the adopted Major Street Plan; planning commission & city council training, maintenance of the Census/MPO GIS database; implementation of the 1998-2002 Transit Development Plan; Travel Demand Management techniques, strategies, and proposals for area-wide truck routing, school transportation safety design, an AMTRAK/Greyhound/Public Transit intermodal facility; and the development of recommendations for local transportation policies.
Products: Reports, maps, graphics, and electronic products to support analyses and recommendations for each task.
Schedule: Continuous.
Agency: Regional Transportation Planning Office
Personnel: Local - 150 days
Costs: $65,000 (Includes non-salary costs)
B.2 Task Name: Finalize & Implement the 2020 Update of the Regional Transportation Plan
Objective: To complete the update to the adopted 2015 Regional Transportation Plan to the year 2020 and re-establish project priorities based on the Transportation Planning Region’s values, vision, goals, and strategies and on the analysis of future demand and appropriate alternatives. To identify, analyze, and prioritize transportation needs for all modes of transportation as well as inter-modal facilities, travel demand management, and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS).
Product: Adoption of final 2020 Regional Transportation Plan by TPR member governments.
Schedule: Final version completed by November 1, 1999.
Agency: Regional Transportation Planning Office
Mesa County Planning & Development Dept.
Mesa County Long Range Planning Division
Mesa County Public Works
City of Grand Junction Public Works
City of Grand Junction Community Development
City of Fruita Planning/Engineering Dept.
Town of Palisade Planning/Engineering Dept.
Personnel: Local - 75 days
Costs: $35,750 (Includes non-salary costs)
C. IMPLEMENTATION TASKS
Implementation activities refer to lists of capital projects adopted by the MPO which establish policy guidance on the use of transportation funds in the urbanized area of Grand Junction.
C.1. Task Name: FY 2000-2005 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP).
Objective: The Fiscal Years 2000-2005 TIP will establish the capital projects in the urbanized area for which federal assistance is expected. It will contain an annual element showing specific projects to which funds have been committed by the participating agencies, including the City of Grand Junction’s Engineering Dept., Mesa County Engineering Dept. and CDOT Region 3.
Products: The FY 2000-2005 Transportation Improvement Plan.
Schedule: First draft in May with local adoption by July 15th.
Agency: MPO Administrator
Personnel: Local - 20 days
Costs: $2,250 (Includes non-salary costs)
FIGURE 4 -- TASK SCHEDULE
Task | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sept |
A.1 FY 2000 UPWP | D | R | ||||||||||
A.2 Administration | R | R | R | R | ||||||||
A.3 Training and Travel | R | R | R | R | ||||||||
B.1 Planning Tasks | R | R | ||||||||||
B.2 Final/Imp. 2020 Update | D | R | ||||||||||
C.1 2000-2005 TIP | R | R | D | R |
D = DRAFT REPORT DUE
R = REPORT DUE
1900-00-00T00:00:00
[1]
Now that there are three of us in the office, I have booted up the training money to $7,500.