RESOLUTION NO. 66-06
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION, MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS, DETERMINING THAT PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE
GPD GLOBAL/WOOMER ANNEXATION
LOCATED AT 2322 AND 2328 I-70 FRONTAGE ROAD INCLUDING A PORTION OF
I-70 AND 23 ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY
IS ELIGIBLE FOR ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, on the 19th day of April, 2006, a petition was submitted to the City Council of the City of Grand Junction, Colorado, for annexation to said City of the following property situate in Mesa County, Colorado, and described as follows:
GPD GLOBAL/WOOMER ANNEXATION
All that certain portion of the SW1/4NW1/4 and the SE1/4NW1/4 of Section 32 in Township One North in Range One West of the Ute Meridian, County of Mesa, State of Colorado, described as follows:
All of Appleton West Planned Commercial Park, as recorded on April 8, 1981, in Plat Book 12 at Page 364, Reception Number 1253174 in the Office of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder, TOGETHER WITH all of Elder, Quinn & McGill Inc. Planned Commercial Park, as recorded on December 17, 1980, in Plat Book 12 at Page 338, Reception Number 1243099 in said Office of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder.
The perimeter of said Tract (or Tracts) is more particularly describe by the following: Commencing at a Mesa County Survey Marker for the N1/16 Corner on the westerly line of said Section 32, from whence a Mesa County Survey Marker for the W1/4 Corner of said Section 32 bears S 00º03’17” W, as determined by the values of the Mesa County Land Coordinate System, for a distance of 1321.43 feet; thence S 00º03’17” W, on said westerly line, for a distance of 266.27 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of U.S. Interstate 70 (I-70); thence, continuing on said right-of-way line, N 89º55’26” E for a distance of 37.88 feet; thence, continuing on said right-of-way line, S 04º49’34” E for a distance of 53.32 feet to the N.W. Corner of said Appleton West Planned Commercial Park and the Point of Beginning; thence S 89°59’01” E for a distance of 1277.57 feet to the N.E Corner of said Appleton West Planned Commercial Park; thence S 00°03’32” W on the common line between said Appleton West Planned Commercial Park and Hanson Subdivision, as recorded on October 06, 2005, in Book 4010 at Page 196, Reception Number 2279499 in said Office of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder, for a distance of 341.19 feet to the N.W. Corner of said Elder, Quinn & McGill Inc. Planned Commercial Park; thence S 89°58’46” E, on the common line between said Elder, Quinn & McGill Inc. Planned Commercial Park and said Hanson Subdivision, for a distance of 553.64 feet to the N.E. Corner of said Elder, Quinn and McGill Inc. Planned Commercial Park; thence continuing on said common line, S 00°03’32”W for a distance of 395.76 feet to the S.E. Corner of said Elder, Quinn & McGill Inc. Planned Commercial Park and the northerly right-of-way line of U.S. Interstate 70 (I-70) as recorded on January 16, 1964, in Book 862 at Page 507 in said Office of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder; thence N89°40’34” W on said northerly right-of-way line for a distance of 553.65 feet to the S.W. Corner of said Elder, Quinn & McGill Inc. Planned Commercial Park; thence continuing on the northerly right-of-way line of said U.S. Interstate 70 (I-70), as recorded on January 27, 1964 in Book 803 at Page 240 in said Office of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder, N 89°40’34” W for a distance of 931.66 feet; thence, continuing on said right-of-way line, N 56°39’04” W for a distance of 238.51 feet; thence, continuing on said right-of-way, line N 63°06’34” W for a distance of 111.80 feet; thence, continuing on said right-of-way line, N 04°49’34” W for a distance of 549.38 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 25.297 Acres more or less
WHEREAS, a hearing on the petition was duly held after proper notice on the 7th day of June, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the Council has found and determined and does hereby find and determine that said petition is in substantial compliance with statutory requirements therefore, that one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the City; that a community of interest exists between the territory and the City; that the territory proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future; that the said territory is integrated or is capable of being integrated with said City; that no land held in identical ownership has been divided without the consent of the landowner; that no land held in identical ownership comprising more than twenty acres which, together with the buildings and improvements thereon, has an assessed valuation in excess of two hundred thousand dollars is included without the landowner’s consent; and that no election is required under the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION THAT;
The said territory is eligible for annexation to the City of Grand Junction, Colorado, and should be so annexed by Ordinance.
ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2006.
Attest:
/s/ James J. Doody
President of the Council
/s/ Stephanie Tuin
City Clerk